At a glance
- Coastal adaptation decisions must account for long timeframes, uncertainty, and climate risk, often using risk-based or flexible approaches.
- There is a need for integrated, iterative appraisal frameworks combining economics with engineering, environmental, and community considerations.
- Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is the primary tool, but is often complemented by cost-effectiveness and multi-criteria analysis.
Economic analysis helps guide coastal climate adaptation decisions
Climate change impacts threaten coastal infrastructure, ecosystems, and communities and so require adaptation planning that is evidence based and supported by the community. Economic analysis plays a central role in this process by helping decision-makers allocate scarce resources efficiently and prioritise adaptation strategies that support fair adaptation and resilient communities.
Broadly, the aim of economic analysis for coastal adaptation is to compare the costs of implementing adaptation measures with the benefits of avoided damages, reduced risks, and improved resilience.
This is particularly important for coastal contexts, where adaptation investments often have substantial upfront costs, long timeframes for implementation and long-term implications under a future climate. It is also challenged by difficulties inherent in
Economic methods can provide a structured framework for coastal adaptation by enabling systematic comparison of options and supporting efficient investment decisions.
Challenges for economics of coastal adaptation
Commonly used economic methods
Commonly used economic methods in coastal adaptation
Cost benefit analysis
Multi-criteria analysis
LIfe cycle costing
Methods that consider undertainty
Real options analysis
Economics for nature-based strategies
State guidance for economic adaptation at the coast
State-based guidance for economic analysis in coastal adaptation reflects a spectrum from more prescriptive approach to economic appraisal through to flexible planning frameworks.
Broadly, they recommend a shift from standalone CBA toward integrated, flexible, and risk-based economic evaluation frameworks that take into account consider the uncertainty and complexity of coastal climate adaptation.
| State | Program | Approach to economics | Key methods used |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | Coastal Management Manual & Coastal Management Programs (CMPs) | CBA-centred | CBA, monetisation tools |
| Queensland | QCoast2100 Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy (CHAS) | Structured integrated framework | MCA + CBA required |
| South Australia | Climate Ready Coasts Economic Analysis Technical Compendium | Practical toolkit | Full + rapid CBA Qualitative |
| Tasmania | State climate adaptation & coastal planning frameworks (no specific coastal program) | Strategic, high-level | Qualitative + external methods |
| Victoria | Victoria’s Resilient Coast. Adapting for 2100+ | Flexible decision framework | CBA + MCA + qualitative |
| WA | Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Planning (CHRMAP) | Planning-led | Variable, project-specific |
a CoastAdapt case study that broadly outlines the economic value of adaptation for Victoria.
a CoastAdapt case study of an economic study of managed retreat for a community in Hawaii

